When modern humans left Africa ca.
60,000 years ago (60 kya), they were already infected with
Helicobacter pylori, and these bacteria have subsequently
diversified in parallel with their human hosts. But how long were
humans infected by H. pylori prior to the out-of-Africa
event? Did this co-evolution predate the emergence of modern humans,
spanning the species divide?
At the global level, H. pylori
has been subdivided by population genetic tools such as STRUCTURE
[5]
into multiple, relatively distinct populations that are specific for
large geographical areas: hpEurope, hpSahul, hpEastAsia, hpAsia2,
hpNEAfrica, hpAfrica1 and hpAfrica2 (Figure
1) [6]–[8].
Neighbor-joining population tree of extant populations of H. pylori. |
Phylogeographic patterns in H.
pylori have been shown to reflect significant demographic events
in human prehistory [6],
[11].
H. pylori has accompanied anatomically modern humans since
their migrations out of Africa some 60,000 years ago (60 kya), and
mirrors the human pattern of increased genetic distance and decreased
diversity with distance from Africa [7].
However, the age of an association between humans and H. pylori
has not been elucidated, other than that it predates 60 kya.
The distribution of H.
pylori populations in Africa.
|
Bayesian cluster analysis was performed
with the non-admixture model of STRUCTURE [5]
for estimates of the total number of populations, K, between 2 and 5,
which was the highest value of K that yielded consistent clustering
and consistent probability estimates between individual runs. Almost
half of the San haplotypes (26/56, 46%) belong to hpAfrica2 (Figure
3A, Figure
4A,B, Table
2). hpAfrica2 isolates were found in all three San communities,
ranging in frequency from 28% of all haplotypes (!Xun) to 55% (Khwe,
Khomani).We also identified 35 hpAfrica2 haplotypes among isolates
from the Northern Sotho near Pretoria and from Xhosa and Europeans in
Cape Town.
Bayesian population assignments
using STRUCTURE
V2.0.
|
The consensus tree from this analysis shows that the southern
(Khomani, Bantu) San haplotypes fell into a young clade which emerged
from an more ancestral population of hpAfrica2 haplotypes, all of
which were from San and most of which were from the northern Khwe and
!Xun (Figure
3C). These observations suggest that hpAfrica2 evolved within the
San and was subsequently transmitted to Bantus.
Almost all non-other haplotypes from San were assigned to
hpAfrica1. In contrast, to the results described above, these were
less diverse (π 95% CL [2.50, 2.82%]) than hpAfrica1 from Bantus
([3.10, 3.20%]), suggesting that the San had acquired hpAfrica1 from
Bantu.
We therefore shotgun sequenced the
genome of H. cetorum strain MIT 99-5665, which represents
the closest known relative of H. pylori and Hac [15]
(Figure
2), and used the orthologous nucleotide sequences from that
genome as an outgroup for rooting the CLONALFRAME
tree. Independent analyses yielded the same rooting branch point when
the tree was rooted with and based on orthologs that were shared
between H. pylori and enterohepatic Helicobacter
genomes (data not shown).
A comparison of global H. pylori and human mtDNA phylogenies. |
The TMRCA of all H. pylori
plus Hac lineages was 88–116 kya (CLONALFRAME:
88–92 kya; IMA: 92–116 kya; Table
4, Figure
6A). The date for the coalescence of non-recombining Y-chromosome
lineages in modern humans is similar at 90 kya [39]
to 141.5±15.6 kya [40]
whereas the date of split between L0 and L1–6 mtDNA haplogroups in
humans is older, 194.3±32.5 kya, (Figure
6B) [16],
[17].
Despite the different age estimates, the topology and branching
pattern of the genealogies are strikingly similar between H.
pylori and human mtDNA (Figure
6).
The TMRCA for the split between
hpAfrica2 and Hac is 43–56 kya (Table
4), and hpAfrica2 subsequently split (32–47 kya) into the
northern and southern isolates. We note that a similar date (40 kya)
was recently estimated for the TMRCA of Y-chromosome haplogroup A-M51
among the San by Henn et al. [20],
which also subsequently split between northern and southern San
populations. Within the other super-lineage, the estimated TMRCA was
36–52 kya for the African populations hpAfrica1 and hpNEAfrica
(Table
4).
Finally, the genetic diversity is
greater among hpAfrica2 from San than from Bantu, indicating that it
was transmitted to Bantu in the last few hundred years since their
arrival in southern Africa.
Our data shows that anatomically modern
humans were infected by H. pylori long before their
migrations out of Africa of ~60 kya [7],
[42].
We estimate the minimum age of that association to be approximately
100 kyr (range 88–116). This is comparable to the age of the
coalescence of the human Y-chromosome and about half of the
coalescent for mtDNA. The age of a coalescent is a minimal date
estimate because lineage sorting and bottlenecks lead to extinction
of older lineages, resulting in a single genealogical source of all
subsequent descendents.
We therefore propose that the
association of H. pylori with humans also reflects a host
jump to humans from an unknown species, which occurred approximately
100 kya or earlier. In principle, two later host jumps might explain
the existence of two super-lineages of H. pylori, but this
seems less likely because the similar phylogeographical patterns of
H. pylori and mtDNA haplogroups indicate that they have
undergone a parallel evolutionary history.
Chronological reconstruction of
the major population events occurring during the intimate human-H.
pylori association.
|
The phylogeographic diversity within H.
pylori is inconsistent with a single human expansion from
Africa. H. pylori accompanied humans on the migration of ~60
kya [7],
reaching Oceania not long thereafter [8].
However, European H. pylori possess distinct properties from
most other global populations of these bacteria. H. pylori
from Europe, the Middle East, western Asia and India belong to the
hpEurope population [6],
[7],
[10],
[58]–[60],
which unlike Europeans is typified by great genetic diversity,
greater than in Africa except for southern Africa where strong
genetic diversity results from the presence of the second
super-lineage (hpAfrica2). The great diversity of hpEurope was
attributed to the fact that it is a hybrid population which arose
from the admixture of AE1 (Ancestral Europe 1) and AE2 (Ancestral
Europe 2) (Figure
4B) [6],
[7].
AE1 arose in Central Asia after H. pylori was carried out of
Africa during the Out of Africa migration of ~60 kya [7],
and its descendants are found among extant hpAsia2. However, the data
in Figure
6A indicate that AE2, whose extant descendents in hpNEAfrica are
associated with northeast Africa, first split from its sister lineage
hpAfrica1 36–52 kya, after the (first) Out of Africa migration. We
therefore hypothesize that a second Out of Africa migration in the
last 52 kya brought AE2 to the Levant, after which it came into
secondary contact with AE1. Subsequent extensive admixture resulted
in hpEurope, which subsequently spread to Europe and western Asia
(Figure
8).
Thus, if initial Europeans were
colonized with H. pylori, those bacteria were subsequently
replaced by hpEurope, similar to the replacement of hspAmerind
strains by hpEurope strains among Amerindians from South America
[73].
To illustrate these interpretations, we show approximate routes and
timings for a second colonization of Europe based on the properties
of H. pylori populations (Figure
8), in which migration waves from North East Africa and Central
Asia met and admixed in the Middle East and/or Western Asia sometimes
10–52 kya. The widespread presence of hpEurope in Mediterranean
Africa is then attributed to later migrations to northern Africa,
including migrations from Iberia (mtDNA haplogroup H1; 8–9 kya)
[74],
the Near East (mtDNA haplogroup M1; 35 kya) [75];
autosomal DNA; >12 kya [76]),
or even as recently as the expansion of the Islamic caliphate in the
last 1200 years. Our model also summarizes the dates of other human
migrations that have distributed H. pylori from its southern
African source (Figure
8).
Interesting (notwithstanding the unbelievably short age estimates). Good catch.
ReplyDeleteI made a quick reference at my blog. Something that intrigues me is that no Neanderthal/Erectus/Denisovan exogenous H. pylori clades have been detected.
The Age issue will be settled soon enough Maju, with whole genome sequences becoming more and more available due to a reduction in cost, the margin of error on mutation rate estimates will also decrease.
DeleteWith respect to Neandertal/Erectus/Denisovan H.pylori, wouldn't you need live specimens to perform gastric biopsies on? I don't think it is like ancient DNA or anything, although I may be wrong......
The study included a feline strain (Helicobacter acinonychis, or Hac) but no Amerindian ones. It's bizarre from a simple sampling point of view and again betrays the pro-African bias in genetics publications. Amerindian data is probably messy and doesn't easily fit the model. But, more importantly, I'm not aware of any other cases of a host jump from humans to other species. Even if it occurred, it's unclear why it happened only once, plus, oddly enough, precisely during the early stages of the evolution of the most divergent San strains. If the host jump happened from felines to humans (as it did in the case of HIV that jumped from chimps to humans), then it's clear where those divergent San strains come from. Definitely not because San are that ancient. Admixture with African hominins may then also explain the divergent mtDNA types found in Africa.
DeleteAll divergent mtDNA in Africa still springs from the same root which is dated to no older than 200KYA, Hominini is the reputed common ancestor of chimps and humans that lived greater than 6 million years ago, neither is there any evidence for old homo species like antecessor, ergaster, erectus et. al having an mtMRCA with living humans before all living humans have one with each other.
DeleteWe have genetic evidence for some kind of archaic admixture in Africa (http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2011/08/29/1109300108), but in the absence of fossil DNA we can't ascertain it. The presence of admixture shifts the root of a tree. But I wasn't trying to shift the discussion over to mtDNA. It's the feline strain of H.p that caught my eye.
ReplyDelete"The presence of admixture shifts the root of a tree"
DeleteWhere is the evidence for this? Also if that were the case, non-Africans, who have been proven to have denisovan and/or neandertal admixture (3-8%) would have more genetic diversity due to this Admixture, but clearly this is not the case as a decline in genetic diversity is still observed further from Africa, even in the face of the fact that archaic admixture is present in these populations.
"Where is the evidence for this?"
ReplyDeletehttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajpa.21506/abstract
"Also if that were the case, non-Africans, who have been proven to have denisovan and/or neandertal admixture (3-8%) would have more genetic diversity due to this Admixture, but clearly this is not the case as a decline in genetic diversity is still observed further from Africa, even in the face of the fact that archaic admixture is present in these populations."
African populations may just be more admixed with archaics than non-African populations. The only reason we can so confidently talk about Denisovan and Neandertal contributions to the modern human gene pool is because we have ancient DNA from those two species of archaic hominins. In Africa we don't have and probably won't have this evidence. But judging from the fact that African linguistic diversity is low (and language is the chief indicator of behavioral modernity) Africa must have been peopled relatively late. It's consistent with the presence of an Upper Paleolithic Eurasian skull in South Africa (Hofmeyr) and with the reduced levels of megafauna extinction in Africa. (If humans became modern in Africa, giraffes wouldn't have survived.) Africa's high intragroup allele diversity then stems from 1) archaic admixture at greater amounts than outside of Africa; 2) higher mutation rate; 3) higher level of intraspecific admixture or any combination of the three.
German Sources: “http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajpa.21506/abstract”
DeleteOn the contrary that source you provided that was focused only on the America's (speaking just from the abstract) does not contradict neither the serial founder model nor that the presence of archaic admixture 'shifts the root of the tree' as you put it, since this is what it says:
“we find that genetic diversity is still largely hierarchically structured and that gene flow between neighboring groups has had surprisingly little impact on macrogeographic patterns of genetic diversity in the Americas.”
German Says: “African populations may just be more admixed with archaics than non-African populations.”
Yet, there has never been any Y or mtDNA found in Africa that is considered by any geneticist as 'archaic'.
German Says: “In Africa we don't have and probably won't have this evidence.”
Now that would be quite convenient for you would it not?, however you shouldn't expect me to take it serious with out any evidence.
German Says: “But judging from the fact that African linguistic diversity is low”
It is estimated that about one third of the World's languages are spoken in Africa, where as the contribution of Africa to the World's population is only about one seventh.
"On the contrary that source you provided that was focused only on the America's (speaking just from the abstract) does not contradict neither the serial founder model nor that the presence of archaic admixture 'shifts the root of the tree' as you put it, since this is what it says..."
ReplyDeleteI gave you the reference in the hopes that you would educate yourself about the contents of the paper. It's useless to argue with me on the basis of misguided abstract reading. Here's a relevant quote: "The tree is rooted in northern North America because the gene identities between the three northern North America populations and the other Native American populations are particularly low. European admixture has contributed to this low identity, and, in principle, it could account for the position of the root." The situation with archaic admixture is no different from any other admixture.
"Yet, there has never been any Y or mtDNA found in Africa that is considered by any geneticist as 'archaic'."
First of all, haploid systems are too mutable. The very fact that "archaic admixture" was detected outside of mtDNA and Y-DNA speaks to the unreliable nature of both. Y-DNA is a good example: African SNPs aren't found on lineages outside of Africa (see the recent paper by Klyosov (http://www.scirp.org/journal/aa) clearly indicating that there was no out-of-Africa migration. Hg A seems to be old but it's SNPs aren't found on lineages outside of Africa. This may indicate that hg A is an archaic introgression into a founding modern human population in Africa that arrived there some 40,000 years ago. See also an exchange on my blog (http://anthropogenesis.kinshipstudies.org/2012/05/the-stereotype-of-a-beringian-refugium/#comment-169) regarding a reversed Y-DNA tree.
"Now that would be quite convenient for you would it not?, however you shouldn't expect me to take it serious with out any evidence."
This doesn't make sense. I was talking about the lack of fossil DNA from Africa and you're asking me to give evidence for the lack of fossil DNA in Africa????
"It is estimated that about one third of the World's languages are spoken in Africa, where as the contribution of Africa to the World's population is only about one seventh."
What matters is the number of unique linguistic stocks in Africa: there are no more than 20 of those, including isolates (Nilo-Saharan, Afroasiatic, Laal, etc.). Read Sands, Dimmendaal and other post-Greenbergian historical linguistics in Africa. In the New World, there are 140 stocks and isolates.